Pimm – Partial immortalization

A Biotech Geek (micro)Blogger’s adventures through science, technology and the web…

  • email me

    [attilacsordas][at][gmail.com]
  • Attila on Twitter

  • Recent Comments

    Open Source Science … on Google’s Palimpsest proj…
    Reviews New Gadget on Why the Dyna-Vision G1 Android…
    name on How to read PDF files on iPhon…
    Wrinkle Reviews on Terrific Pixar-style Harvard a…
    Bony Yousuf on Systemic regmed
    Face Anti Wrinkle on Rumors on Amatokin: a skin ste…
    Liyal Blog on Rumors on Amatokin: a skin ste…
    Big Tits and Curvy A… on Spit a big in a tube, search w…
    Sean on Vadlo, the beta biomedical sea…
    Bony Yousuf on Rumors on Amatokin: a skin ste…
  • licence

    Creative Commons License
  • c

  •  

    April 2007
    M T W T F S S
    « Mar   May »
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    30  

What does a good laboratory homepage look like? Show me at least one!

Posted by attilachordash on April 16, 2007

In life sciences the basic, functional unit of cooperation and research is a LAB.

Now am I alone with my opinion that most academic laboratory web pages simply do not meet any advanced, current, dynamic web standards, although this would be crucial for them?

What information should a good laboratory homepage offer, and what design would be desirable? What is the proper balance of design and functionality? Considering content: principal investigator and lab members, research interests, publications, available positions, contact infos, grants, methods, setup, tools, cooperative partners, awards, multimedia files, audios, videos, blogs, news, media coverages, interviews? In contrast, many lab pages say that they were last updated in 2004. Unthinkable. I got a one sentence theory on why many academic web pages suck today: scientists (dominantly physicists and mathematicians) were out of the first inhabitants of the word wide web, and most academic web pages were made by scientist-turned web geeks in the 1.0 era. But that era is clearly over, the 90’s has gone, and what we are seeing today is often not enough.

As I am more tempted to immerse in positive criticism, I link here 3 lab homepages in alphabetical order in my beloved stem cell and mitochondria field, which are quite good and I’d like to ask my readers which of them is the best and why? Also, I’d like to start a unofficial competition for the best laboratory web page on the Internets, so please readers, place your bets and suggest your nominees. List of the other nominees can be found at the end of the post.

Bernstein lab (look at the video)

bernstein lab

Nunnari lab

nunnari lab

Teitell lab

teitelllab

Update: Readers also suggested the following ones:

Refinetti lab, University of South Carolina from Coturnix.

Jessell lab of Columbia Univ. from Alvin.

Redfield lab from Dr. Rosemary Redfield.“It’s not slick, but it’s open science. We post our grant proposals as soon as they’re submitted, and the page has links to our blogs about our research-in-progress.”

Gregory lab from Professor Ryan Gregory.

Kissinger’s lab from Nandita Mullapudi. “I like ours because it is fancy-free, clean and slick. It has links to websites that are research based as well as daily-use websites like the university system, etc, making it convenient for a homepage.

Hui lab from Zachary Moore.

Laboratory of Tree Ring Research from Jim Swetnam, although it is more of a research institute than a distinct laboratory.

Purvis Lab at Imperial College, UK from Dave Hone.

Leander lab, Roger lab, Archibald lab, Waller lab, Patterson lab from Opisthokont.

Ramaswamy lab from Matt.

Rissler lab from Kathryn Perez.

Evans Group from suchire.

Zhang’s Lab of Molecular and Genomic Evolution from TR Gregory.

Stagljar Lab from Eva.

Ruthazer lab from Jeff.

Mullin’s lab from peretz.

Wolpert lab Cambridge University from Ah.

Duffy lab University of Connecticut from John.

Pielak lab at UNC Chapel Hill from Gary Pielak. Simplicity. Also saying where students end up.

John Plane’s lab in Leeds from JD.

Conklin lab from Natalie.

Wilkinson lab from Pierre based on the semantic web and RDF graphs. Not bench science but bioinformatics.

 

37 Responses to “What does a good laboratory homepage look like? Show me at least one!”

  1. [...] the majority were designed by the first inhabitants of the web and asks us to prove him wrong by submitting the best laboratory web site to [...]

  2. Alvin said

    Hi! I got directed here from Cortunix, but here’s a dev bio lab’s webbie. Cheers
    http://sklad.cumc.columbia.edu/jessell/

  3. Thanks Alvin, post updated.

  4. Check out ours (www.zoology.ubc.ca/~redfield).

    It’s not slick, but it’s open science. We post our grant proposals as soon as they’re submitted, and the page has links to our blogs about our research-in-progress.

  5. The University of Texas’ Southwestern Medical Center department of Molecular Genetics page is pretty good.

    As is this lab page in the University of Cincinnati’s department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, if I do say so myself.

  6. Thank you very much for the nominees, I try to keep them updated. Please also tell us why do you think these pages are good and functional and what special features they have. Zach: The University of Texas’ Southwestern Medical Center department of Molecular Genetics is not a lab.

  7. Jim Swetnam said

    http://www.ltrr.arizona.edu

    I would like to nominate the web page of the Laboratory of Tree Ring Research at the University of Arizona. See the link above

  8. Dave Hone said

    The ‘Purvis Lab’ at Imperial College, London UK, has an excellent homepage. Lots of papaers, recent works, CVs, links and the rest.

    http://www.bio.ic.ac.uk/evolve/

  9. Brian said

    I’m always a little weirded out when I come to a laboratories homepage that’s completely tricked out. It just seems like it would be a better use of time/money to be doing research. Just give me the basics so I can find what I need.

  10. Opisthokont said

    Here are a few good laboratory homepages from my field of research:

    http://www.botany.ubc.ca/bleander/home.html
    http://rogerlab.biochemistryandmolecularbiology.dal.ca/
    http://myweb.dal.ca/jmarchib/
    http://www.botany.unimelb.edu.au/eukdiv/
    http://www.bio.usyd.edu.au/Protsvil/

    Good enough, perhaps?

  11. Perfect little collection Opisthokont, thanks. A commenter at Pharyngula called the problem discussed here “out-of-date webpage syndrome”.

  12. Matt said

    http://sil.biochem.uiowa.edu/

  13. This is my favorite: Dr. Leslie Rissler at University of Alabama.

    http://bama.ua.edu/%7Erissler/

  14. suchire said

    http://daecr1.harvard.edu/ is definitely one of the top for chemistry.

  15. TR Gregory said

    A nice page at http://www.umich.edu/~zhanglab/

  16. Eva said

    I really like this one:
    http://biochemistry.utoronto.ca/stagljar/index.html

    It’s a lab in my department, but not my lab. Our own lab website is confined by hospital regulations that even prescribe which font to use, where the words go, and which words should or shouldn’t be bold. No room for creativity…

  17. maxine said

    Very interesting. I’ve posted about this on Nautilus at:
    http://blogs.nature.com/nautilus/2007/04/what_a_good_laboratory_home_pa.html

    Look forward to finding out who wins!
    All best
    Maxine.

  18. John Schloendorn said

    http://www.biodesign.org

  19. Jeff said

    The only reason why most research websites suck is because most academics don’t know HTML, or the importance of HTML.

    Here’s a cool one, not the best, but fun…

    http://ruthazerlab.mcgill.ca/

  20. peretz said

    I like this quirky one from the Dyche Mullin’s lab at UCSF:

    http://mullinslab.ucsf.edu/

  21. coturnix said

    I recently discovered this one which I like – it has a blog and everything:
    http://brembs.net/

    http://bjoern.brembs.net/news.php

  22. Mr. Gunn said

    Can I nominate Tulane Gene Therapy for “worst offender”?

    I saw a mention of your name at NFTB and I thought it sounded familiar. You visited our lab back in March. How’s it been going?

  23. Hi Grady, thanks I ‘m fine, how about you? Well here we are seeking good laboratory web pages in the ocean of not too good lab pages so I do not think that seeking “worst offenders” is the best idea. Actually I was really amazed by the Virtual Tour of the Center for Gene Therapy at the Tulane site since it is informative, full of multimedia (nice motion pictures) and…personal. So virtual tours around labs are cool features.

  24. Miriam said

    This is a cute competition….
    The best site by far that I have seen is of Dale Purves’ lab. It is esthetically presented, has all of the key information a surfer needs, is updated all of the time, and has a really good see for yourself section, which is a lot of fun.
    The adress is: http://www.purveslab.net/main/

  25. I like to keep my site simple; my brother Chris designs it. I also believe in saying where students end up.

  26. JD said

    John Plane’s Group in Leeds: Something plain and simple and in keeping with the university website rules!

    http://www.chem.leeds.ac.uk/JMCP/

  27. Harlan said

    Can anyone recommend an easy-to-use system for maintaining academic web sites? Some sort of template for a content-management system, for example? Ideally free software? Something that can be hosted on a lab computer and that has a non-HTML-interface for non-technies to update things easily?

  28. Pierre said

    Mark Wilkinsson’s lab

    http://bioinfo.icapture.ubc.ca/

    it may looks austere but it is based on semantic web. A RDF graph (http://bioinfo.icapture.ubc.ca/labinfo/labinfo) is painted via graphviz , it can be used to quickly navigate to the information you are looking for and this data can be interpreted by a software.

    Pierre

  29. Antonio said

    Natural Products Synthesis lab at the IPNA-CSIC (and any of its other labs):

    Natural Products Synthesis lab

    General menu is always present allowing direct access to any web section.

    General contact info is always present at the bottom.

    From a technical point of view:

    - Most of the websites offer a plain e-mail address format instead of a tweaked one probably leading to massive spam attacks.
    - CSS-based structure is preferred to tabular one.
    - We are currently moving to a custom content manegement system.

    Antonio

  30. Robert said

    Harlan, you could check out PublicationsList.org (I helped develop it).

    Its not a complete solution for lab websites, but it gives a neat way to handle publications where the collective list is dynamically included in your site but each member just manages their own list on the server.

    If your papers show up on PubMed you can also set up an email alert where you just cick to confirm whether a new paper should be added to the list.

    Robert

  31. Banoo said

    This isn’t terribly fancy, but this part of my lab’s website gives everyone passing through our lab a useful starting checklist on where to find lots of important daily use items. (Yup, I maintain it….)

  32. [...] colleague, Attila, asked me months ago what are the components of a good laboratory website. However, my thoughts remained incomplete until I read David Crotty’s post at the CSHL blog [...]

  33. [...] was rather critical (screenshots). Quick reminder: The LaWVas awards is the one that grew out of my unofficial lab website competition idea. The winning sites as selected by the editorial team, judging panel and the readers will be [...]

  34. telecharger poker en ligne gratuites

  35. disco stu said

    Biased opinion perhaps, but definitely a fan of my colleagues’ site:

    The Columbus Lab at UVA

  36. E said

    Vawter Lab at University of California, Irvine

  37. Ron Faxi said

    Without doubt your design should dynamic that gives a good first impression, bearing in mind what your customers find interesting, in the same breath the conet needs to be search engine freindly. Acheive this and links into your site will occure naturally asvisitors save to social sites, add to their own websites etc etc read the google webmaster tools for how best to acheive this – a multitude of advice is available.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>