Pimm – Partial immortalization

A Biotech Geek (micro)Blogger’s adventures through science, technology and the web…

  • email me

    [attilacsordas][at][gmail.com]
  • Attila on Twitter

  • Recent Comments

    Jared on SciFoo links visualized by Tou…
    Ben on The marketing problem of life …
    Denise on Maximum Life CEO David Kekich:…
    ezDigg on Are life extensionists mainly …
    ezDigg on 23andMe’s mission: conne…
    ezDigg on Google Health, IBM: real-time,…
    MAstork on Rumors on Amatokin: a skin ste…
    Bash on Are there any mitochondria in …
    A Garage-Level Biome… on John Schloendorn, the LysoSENS…
    LavaAmp Launched Coa… on LavaAmp: cheapest pocket PCR t…
  • licence

    Creative Commons License
  • c

  •  

    June 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « May   Jul »
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    30  

Archive for June 3rd, 2008

What path would you follow: Shumway or Barnard?

Posted by attilachordash on June 3, 2008

Monya Baker has an excellent Q&A with the authors of the recent Nature Insight: Regenerative Medicine over at The Niche blog. Ken Chien, the author of Regenerative medicine and human models of human disease – see earlier postrecalls the paradigmatic story of heart transplantation and the 2 main surgeons behind, Norman Shumway and Christiaan Barnard, who are perfect representatives of the different paths of pioneering clinicians:

Sometimes in looking forward it’s good to look back. In cardiac regenerative medicine, probably the only clear success to date is heart transplantation. From the initial grant that Norman Shumway received in 1958 [to study the possibility of heart transplantation] it took more than two decades before the procedure became routine.

Shumway was a careful, thoughtful man. He not only didn’t do the first heart transplant; he didn’t do the second. He was slowed down in the United States because of the regulatory barriers and ethical concerns. Christiaan Barnard, on the other hand, went back to South Africa and decided to just go for it. Sounds familiar?

We realized very quickly that this was not working, that the science was not there. In 1968, a year after his first attempt, Barnard gave up on the procedure and considered it a failure. Everyone gave up, except Shumway. He went back to the lab and spent the next ten years figuring it out. He realized that the issue was rejection. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Nature, Nature Report Stem Cells, The Niche, USA, biology, biotechnology, medicine, science, stem cells | Leave a Comment »

Meet the biogangers in the FriendFeed unconference room!

Posted by attilachordash on June 3, 2008

As of this moment the population of The Life Scientists Room on FriendFeed is 73. See the BioGang in motion and get an initial statistics on the distribution of wet lab/dry lab, academic/industrial people there. Here are the first 8 answerers out of the 16 so far.

Posted in FriendFeed, bioinformatics, biology, biotechnology, laboratory, science | 1 Comment »