Pimm – Partial immortalization

A Biotech Geek (micro)Blogger’s adventures through science, technology and the web…

  • email me

    [attilacsordas][at][gmail.com]
  • Attila on Twitter

  • Recent Comments

    Thomas Staub on How to read PDF files on iPhon…
    rick oden on Life extension people are happ…
    xong vue on Life extension people are happ…
    best wrinkle cream on Aging-centric genetic health d…
    best wrinkle cream on Rumors on Amatokin: a skin ste…
    HomeAndBodyEssence on Rumors on Amatokin: a skin ste…
    Uk Bingo Bonuses on The marketing problem of life …
    One way back link on Whatbox, Upper Lost Side, Stem…
    revathi on Human mitochondrial DNA vs. nu…
    Bryan- Logo Design on How to read PDF files on iPhon…
  • licence

    Creative Commons License
  • c

  •  

    May 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « Apr   Jun »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  

Archive for May 15th, 2008

How overrated is phosphorylation? – an opinion

Posted by attilachordash on May 15, 2008

David Secko writes: “Today, it is thought that one third of the proteins present in a typical mammalian cell are covalently bound to phosphate (i.e. they are phosphorylated at one time or another)”

Well I haven’t checked what kind of measurement the above 1/3 estimation is based on but if true it is no wonder that phosphorylation is the almost constant subject of biological research. But if it is not true, then what’s the reason of the stardom?

I got one of my smartest comment to my Human proteome project: 21000 genes/1 protein, 10 years, $1 billion? from a scientist at the University if Rochester that could suggest an answer:

“Another example – we study protein phosphorylation and we think it’s important. Why? Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in biology, methods, proteome, science | 6 Comments »