Pimm – Partial immortalization

A Biotech Geek (micro)Blogger’s adventures through science, technology and the web…

  • email me

    [attilacsordas][at][gmail.com]
  • Attila on Twitter

    • Red Mars before sleep &after JavaScript:dropping windmills=>spin=>heat in coils=>release to atmosphere, winds slowing down=>dust storms down 16 hours ago
    • Hard to believe, learn in what sense? See/trial & error? RT @GreatDismal I learn more watching people use new tech than using it myself 18 hours ago
    • nephews (11,13) just learned how to run, modify & debug the 'Hello World' JavaScript on the iPhone w/ Notes, variables & functions next ;) 23 hours ago
    • Family party this afternoon: preparing w/little JavaScript snippets on the iPhone for my nephews so they can run scripts on their iPod touch 1 day ago
    • Safari is losing http requests to Chrome/Firefox on my laptop due to the lack of an omnibox capability 1 day ago
  • Recent Comments

    GB on Visualize 23andMe haplogroup d…
    MaryHollmy on Google Health, IBM: real-time,…
    colon hydrotherapy l… on Why the Dyna-Vision G1 Android…
    revathi on Human mitochondrial DNA vs. nu…
    Erik Cole on Michael Rose, evolutionary SEN…
    drugrehabusa on Stem Cell Therapy Market, US, …
    Letago on Can you tell a good article fr…
    Online Offers on Life extension people are happ…
    เสื้อผ้า on How to read PDF files on iPhon…
    atsoft on Add stem cells and eat the lab…
  • licence

    Creative Commons License
  • c

  •  

    December 2007
    M T W T F S S
    « Nov   Jan »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  

Archive for December 4th, 2007

Bureaucrats and the overuse of the passive voice in science writing

Posted by attilachordash on December 4, 2007

I’ve found the following fine paragraph in the Autumn edition of Nurture, the magazine for past and present Nature journal authors. Linda Cooper writes on “How to make research accessible”:

Take the overuse of the passive voice. Scientists tend to think that the passive voice creates an objective tone. But when they rely too heavily on passive constructions, researchers rarely captures the enthusiasm they have for their work. Although such writing may be fine for bureaucrats, removing the scientist from an article, drains life from the paper.

Nurture autumn issue

Posted in Nature Publishing Group, science writing | 1 Comment »