Pimm – Partial immortalization

A Biotech Geek (micro)Blogger’s adventures through science, technology and the web…

  • email me

    [attilacsordas][at][gmail.com]
  • Attila on Twitter

  • Recent Comments

    HomeAndBodyEssence on Rumors on Amatokin: a skin ste…
    Uk Bingo Bonuses on The marketing problem of life …
    One way back link on Whatbox, Upper Lost Side, Stem…
    revathi on Human mitochondrial DNA vs. nu…
    Bryan- Logo Design on How to read PDF files on iPhon…
    GB on Visualize 23andMe haplogroup d…
    MaryHollmy on Google Health, IBM: real-time,…
    colon hydrotherapy l… on Why the Dyna-Vision G1 Android…
    revathi on Human mitochondrial DNA vs. nu…
    Erik Cole on Michael Rose, evolutionary SEN…
  • licence

    Creative Commons License
  • c

  •  

    March 2007
    M T W T F S S
    « Feb   Apr »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  

Archive for March 22nd, 2007

Nature Publishing Editor on the idea of a public scientific multimedia site

Posted by attilachordash on March 22, 2007

lymphMaxine Clarke, Publishing Executive Editor of Nature and blogger of Peer-to-Peer got interested in the problem of “supporting information” and in the idea of an open access, peer-review supporting information aggregator website. She shared with me her valuable thoughts and informations by mail, from which I now publish parts with the permission of Maxine Clarke (emphasis by me).

On the possibility of a community-approved public multimedia site (videos, audios, pictures) with open access supporting information from peer-review journals.

It would indeed be nice for authors and readers to have such a facility. If there were to be a multimedia database, accepted by the community, we’d be happy to consider making deposition mandatory. Our principle is that data described in our papers are freely available, so if there were a community-approved public multimedia site, which included annotatation and curation, we’d be happy to consider making it a condition of publication for movies etc to be deposited in it. It would need to be publisher-independent to work, so that authors could upload multimedia data wherever they’d published their paper.

The main point for us at Nature is that as a publisher we have to be confident that material published off our website is properly curated, archived and preserved. For example, when we introduced the microarray deposition policy we ensured that there was full community support for the two databases (in one of which, authors’ choice, we require deposition) before implementing the policy. So for this video idea to work, the “database” concerned would need to be publicly accessible (not commercial), curated, annotated etc.

On the status of online supporting information at Nature:

Supplementary Information on the Nature website is free, though you have to register. (Confirmed, see screenshot of a 3D supplementary animation showing that the gut-associated lymphoid tissue comprised of different subsets of haematopoietic cells, Veiga-Fernandes et al.)

On the problem and handling of online supporting information: Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Nature, animation, blogterview, community, open-access, peer-review, science hacks, science journals, science videos, video | 1 Comment »