Pimm – Partial immortalization

A Biotech Geek (micro)Blogger’s adventures through science, technology and the web…

  • email me

    [attilacsordas][at][gmail.com]
  • Attila on Twitter

  • Recent Comments

    Bryan- Logo Design on How to read PDF files on iPhon…
    GB on Visualize 23andMe haplogroup d…
    MaryHollmy on Google Health, IBM: real-time,…
    colon hydrotherapy l… on Why the Dyna-Vision G1 Android…
    revathi on Human mitochondrial DNA vs. nu…
    Erik Cole on Michael Rose, evolutionary SEN…
    drugrehabusa on Stem Cell Therapy Market, US, …
    Letago on Can you tell a good article fr…
    Online Offers on Life extension people are happ…
    เสื้อผ้า on How to read PDF files on iPhon…
  • licence

    Creative Commons License
  • c

  •  

    October 2006
    M T W T F S S
    « Sep   Nov »
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031  

Archive for October 15th, 2006

Financial update to stem cell patent debate: California vs Wisconsin?

Posted by attilachordash on October 15, 2006

The story of the first human embryonic stem cell’s patent (isolated by Thomson) at Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) tariffscontinues. The amount of money behind stem cell patens became visible thanks to David Wahlberg’s exploration in today’s Wisconsin State Journal: The stem-cell patents have brought $3.2 million in license fees to WARF. About 75 percent of the money is funneled back to stem-cell research on campus. … WARF’s patents, which cover both the cells and the methods to grow them, are being challenged by the Los Angeles-based Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer rights. The foundation, involved in California’s new $3 billion stem-cell research initiative, is being joined in the effort by the New York-based Public Patent Foundation. Thomson said the challengers are attacking WARF’s patents because they want California to profit from future patents on discoveries made through its stem-cell research initiative. The initiative is run by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, or CIRM. “The only real difference is that the CIRM-funded patents will largely benefit California, and the WARF patents largely benefit Wisconsin,” he said. Link

Is it the only difference?

Table: tariffs of the first human embryonic stem cell line.


Posted in partial immortalization | Leave a Comment »