Pimm – Partial immortalization

A Biotech Geek (micro)Blogger’s adventures through science, technology and the web…

  • email me

    [attilacsordas][at][gmail.com]
  • Attila on Twitter

    • Red Mars before sleep &after JavaScript:dropping windmills=>spin=>heat in coils=>release to atmosphere, winds slowing down=>dust storms down 14 hours ago
    • Hard to believe, learn in what sense? See/trial & error? RT @GreatDismal I learn more watching people use new tech than using it myself 16 hours ago
    • nephews (11,13) just learned how to run, modify & debug the 'Hello World' JavaScript on the iPhone w/ Notes, variables & functions next ;) 21 hours ago
    • Family party this afternoon: preparing w/little JavaScript snippets on the iPhone for my nephews so they can run scripts on their iPod touch 1 day ago
    • Safari is losing http requests to Chrome/Firefox on my laptop due to the lack of an omnibox capability 1 day ago
  • Recent Comments

    GB on Visualize 23andMe haplogroup d…
    MaryHollmy on Google Health, IBM: real-time,…
    colon hydrotherapy l… on Why the Dyna-Vision G1 Android…
    revathi on Human mitochondrial DNA vs. nu…
    Erik Cole on Michael Rose, evolutionary SEN…
    drugrehabusa on Stem Cell Therapy Market, US, …
    Letago on Can you tell a good article fr…
    Online Offers on Life extension people are happ…
    เสื้อผ้า on How to read PDF files on iPhon…
    atsoft on Add stem cells and eat the lab…
  • licence

    Creative Commons License
  • c

  •  

    May 2006
    M T W T F S S
        Jul »
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  

Why is partial immortalization theoretically and technologically possible?

Posted by attilachordash on May 11, 2006

There are two main arguments supporting our modal statement:
i., negative: there is not any particular natural law, neither biological, nor physical which excludes this possibility.

ii., positive: we could extrapolate the technological draft of a regeneration treatment of the whole human body from the present results and methods of regenerative medicine.

Concerning the first argument, the impossibility proof of something which is not based on an outright logical contradicition, is very hard. But the argument does not say nothing about the realisation of pimm, it just opens some place in the possibility space. What if opposition considers, that entropy, in the statistical "disorder" sense, could cause a problem, say: the second law of thermodynamics necessarily excludes the possibility of pimm, because the total entropy of the human body increases over time and approaching a maximum value? Now the second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of an isolated system will tend to increase over time, approaching a maximum value. One point, where this metaphorical counterargument goes wrong is "isolated system". In thermodynamics, an isolated system is a physical system that does not interact with its surroundings. The human body is not an isolated, and not even a closed system, because it can exchange heat, work, i.e. energy and matter with its environment. I am pleased to announce that the human body is an open system.

opensystem.png

Another source of objection could be based on evolution, but I discuss the connection between pimm, evolution and ageing later.

The second, positive argument is a macroargument, and the technological part of the pimm book tries to explicate this draft. An assertive quote:

”The promise of scientifically verified immortality has gained credibility with every successful organ transplant.” Frank Pasquale: Two concepts of immortality. Yale Journal of Law & the Humaities

Next: Maximum or radical life extension?

Originally posted at May 4th, 2006, http://attilachordash.wordpress.com/

Permalink

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>